What are yours???
Published on March 24, 2007 By Armbut In Windows Vista
Hey there. I'm just wondering for those who have Vista, what your Windows Experience Ratings are?

My Specs:
AMD Athlon 64 2 3800+ 2.0GHz--4.8
1GB PC4200 DDR2 Dual Channel RAM--4.5
ATI Radeon X1300 Pro 256MB--4.7 Graphics; --4.2 Gaming Graphics
160GB SATA 3.0GB/s Hard Drive

My Base Score is 4.2 (Gaming Graphics is lowest subscore)

Comments (Page 11)
12 PagesFirst 9 10 11 12 
on Jan 05, 2009

what significance does this "performance score" have (if any)?

For me, CPU, hard drive, ram scores matter when rendering. Graphic scores come in handy for dreams, video, and 3d apps.

Besides those...bragging rights. It's allways nice to have a top of the line PC.

on Jul 26, 2009

ITS ALL ABOUT PROCESSOR AND RAM

 

 

 

on Jul 26, 2009

Mine here-

on Jul 26, 2009

Besides those...bragging rights. It's allways nice to have a top of the line PC.

Mine isn't exactly top of the line, but it sure kicks the butt of some of my previous clunkers...

* CPU - AMD Phenom II x4 920 & 5.9

* RAM - Corsair DDR2 800 x8gb @ 5.9

* GPU - Nvidia 9800GT  x 1gb @ 5.9

*HDD - Seagate x500gb @ 5.9

See WEI below:

 

I see in Win 7 the WEI goes up to 7.9.  I don't score as well in there... somewhere around 5.8, I think.

on Jul 26, 2009

Page 5 was seriously messed up...open quote.

Fixed now

on Jul 27, 2009

 

 

 

 

        Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 7.4  

 

Memory (RAM)

6.00 GB 7.7

 

Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 6.8

 

Gaming graphics

2299 MB Total available graphics memory 6.8

 

Primary hard disk

200GB Free (233GB Total)

5.9

 

 

Windows 7 Ultimate

Screwy formatting...but info is there...

 

 

 

 

on Jul 28, 2009
Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor AMD Phenom(tm) 9600 Quad-Core Processor 5.9
5.0
  Determined by lowest subscore
Memory (RAM) 3.00 GB 5.9
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 4650 5.0
Gaming graphics 1791 MB Total available graphics memory 5.3
Primary hard disk 294GB Free (455GB Total) 5.8

Windows Vista (TM) Home Premium

 

Used to be 3.5 before I upgraded the video card.

on Jul 28, 2009

 

Your memory score is higher than mine jafo,  I have almost the same setup as you, p6t Asus, I7 920 2.67 GHz.. 12 gigs of Corsair xms ram, I'm running a lower end card though.  Nvida Geforce 9600 GT oc 512. Not Fair!!

 

 

on Jul 28, 2009
Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 7.4
5.9
  Determined by lowest subscore
Memory (RAM) 6.00 GB 7.5
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series 6.5
Gaming graphics 3323 MB Total available graphics memory 6.5
Primary hard disk 264GB Free (302GB Total) 5.9
on Jul 28, 2009

Here is Mine running W-7 the CPU is overclocked to 2.91 it does not show in the Index

More details about my computer

Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 7.2
6.0
  Determined by lowest subscore
Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB 7.2
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 6.0
Gaming graphics 4606 MB Total available graphics memory 6.0
Primary hard disk 671GB Free (699GB Total) 6.0
Windows 7 Ultimate

on Aug 10, 2009

Here is mine for my new I7 Rig

Component Details Subscore Base score
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 7.4
6.0
  Determined by lowest subscore
Memory (RAM) 6.00 GB 7.4
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 6.3
Gaming graphics 3707 MB Total available graphics memory 6.3
Primary hard disk 673GB Free (699GB Total) 6.0

on Sep 05, 2009

I think those numbers aren't worth much. Especially in games. There is more to it than these abstract numbers to get games running smooth.

 

Keeping your drivers up to date is one thing to improve the stability and sometimes performance. It's free and easy to do. Tweaking the eyecandy in a game or application is another. That one requires a little time and experimentation. You'll soon get the hang of it.

 

The amount of RAM is important. These days you should not have less than 4GB. Prices are dropping, so that will be main stream soon. Cutting down the number of background apps and services can have a huge impact on your performance. Under XP make sure that less than 750MB to 1GB of your swap file is in use. Under Vista you will be OK if it is 1 to 1.4GB. Both numbers assume 4GB of physical RAM.

 

Cutting down the number of background apps and services is not all that easy. Mostly because we often have no idea what all these things are doing and what impact they have (if any). So make sure to create a backup of your configuration first. Microsoft has written some guides to help you find bottlenecks. Here are two:

 

How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" state.

 

How to perform a clean boot procedure to determine whether background programs are interfering with a game or a program that you currently use.

That last article applies to both XP and Vista and is in essence similar to the first one.

 

I started this post with the statement that the performance index isn't worth much. Well, that really has to do with all the above. If you ignore those than no matter what hardware you'll have and what your index is then the performance will be poor.

 

BTW: My performance index is 5.9 overall. Vista x64. AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6GHz, 4GB RAM, ATI HD 4890 (1GB video RAM), 500GB HDD (drive C) and 4*500GB in RAID 0 (drive D). And yes, I do the clean boot thingie too. Without it my machine would be crap.

on Sep 08, 2009

I'm confused. how did you all get the higher ratings when the blurbs indicate 5.9 is the max?

from MS "The scale of the Windows Experience Index ranges from 1.0 to 5.9. "

I'm using vista 64bit with SP1

on Sep 08, 2009

They're  running Windows 7 gmc2..

on Sep 09, 2009

showoffs

12 PagesFirst 9 10 11 12