CPU using DeskScapes...
Published on March 13, 2007 By Armbut In DeskScapes
Okay, here's my problem. I've used a few DeskScapes from here, and the one included with Windows Dreamscene. ALL of the animated wallpapers have caused my CPU to go beserk. It hovers at anywhere from 25-40% all the time, with just Firefox and Windows Sidebar running on my machine.

I thought that Aero was supposed to take advantage of advanced graphics cards instead of CPU, and pushing all the energy needed to create cool glassy effects onto the GPU instead. Last time I checked, I needed Aero to run DreamScene, and DreamScene to run DeskScapes. Whats up???

Here's my system:

Windows Vista Ultimate
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (2.0GHz)
1GB PC4200 DDR2 RAM
ATI Radeon X1300Pro (256MB)

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 13, 2007
Oh by the way, I am running a dual-monitor display of 1280x1024 each, BUT even if I disconnect/deconfigure the second monitor and only use one, I still have high CPU usage. It's just annoying seeing it ALWAYS above 25%
on Mar 13, 2007
I'd venture to say your system just isnt competent enough and 25 % is porbably just how its gonna run.

I could be way off.
on Mar 13, 2007
That's easy to answer ( at least I hope so... ). Dreamscene is not finished yet. It's not optimalized for GPU usage.
on Mar 13, 2007
Your system sounds more than adequate enough, it's probably a problem with the software itself, it's still pretty new.
on Mar 13, 2007
Intri is correctomundo. What you and the rest of us are currently running is a Dreamscene Preview only...it does not have the GPU optimization. The full version will have that optimization and then you will see the CPU usage drop...hopefully dramatically.
on Mar 13, 2007
Here's to praying... my FX-55's performance is a little worse than the original poster's 3800, and I know my 7800GTX can pick up that slack! (albeit it is only single core...)
on Mar 13, 2007
Dude... crazy. My PC is essentially the exact same thing except my processor is a 3800+ 2.4. It does the same with me, but like they said, dreamscene isn't actually released yet. On top of that, our systems are kinda starting to drop on the scale of 1 to awesome. Eh, it's okay. I'm still satisfied with the performance.
on Mar 13, 2007
Yeah...a score of 4.2 isn't really something to brag about.
on Mar 13, 2007
Oh......I just saw a 21%. Seems to be goin down a little, it doesn't go above 30 now. Wow, I wonder what happened while I was at school today...
on Mar 13, 2007
My opinion is that you're probably running Dreams that use .WMV instead of .MPEG.  WMV has a lot higher CPU cost for decoding.  Other than that, I would say that as the video drivers get better, the CPU use will go down.
on Mar 13, 2007
Hmm - if the 'release' version of Dreamscene/Deskscape will take better advantage of GPUs, does that mean there is a chance those of use with multi-monitor displays might actually be able to run animated wallpapers across our entire desktop?
on Mar 13, 2007
Frogboy- I've run both, and they both kind of eat things up.
on Mar 13, 2007
yeah...the ones that im talking about are encoded using MPEG-2.
on Mar 13, 2007
Seems Microsoft released 3 new Dreams, found them on my latest updates....
on Mar 13, 2007
And what is your cpu without deskscape running, with aero enabled? If it is low without DS running then it is not aero. It is the video you are using.
2 Pages1 2